We take measures regarding the authentic content ensuring the privacy of our customers, and believe in the transparent approach to the writing process. The reason we are not using common plagiarism checkers is simple: they save the copy of an essay to the database, which can later result in identical work. To take care of our customers and make the order system easier, we apply our own ways. If you are thinking of your next step of the order process, you can contact us for an essay, research paper, academic assignment, lab report or a speech, and we will be happy to assist.
The word 'efficiently' here means up to polynomial-time reductions . This thesis was originally called Computational Complexity-Theoretic Church–Turing Thesis by Ethan Bernstein and Umesh Vazirani (1997). The Complexity-Theoretic Church–Turing Thesis, then, posits that all 'reasonable' models of computation yield the same class of problems that can be computed in polynomial time. Assuming the conjecture that probabilistic polynomial time ( BPP ) equals deterministic polynomial time ( P ), the word 'probabilistic' is optional in the Complexity-Theoretic Church–Turing Thesis. A similar thesis, called the Invariance Thesis , was introduced by Cees F. Slot and Peter van Emde Boas. It states: "Reasonable" machines can simulate each other within a polynomially bounded overhead in time and a constant-factor overhead in space .  The thesis originally appeared in a paper at STOC '84, which was the first paper to show that polynomial-time overhead and constant-space overhead could be simultaneously achieved for a simulation of a Random Access Machine on a Turing machine.